sooo......... a t51r spl isn't a good choice for my 2.0???
You ain't got no chance to beat it..like a man with no hands and a one inccchhhh .
04 Forester XTI - Built Motor (weisco,eagle,sti,arp) FP Green Hta 330whp
83 Rabbit GTI - Scrapped, Heart lives on in the 82
82 Rabbit Diesel L custom - full GTI swap , built head lots of Poly
90 Corrado G60 - First Love , awaiting winning lottery #'s
A 350fwhp civic will screw for sure and costs way less. I hate to say it on a forum like this cuz ill get #!#!#!#!, but my next build will be a extremely clean 2 door civic.
Turbos greatly restrict exhaust flow, completley ruin scavenging (which is what people mistake for back-pressure which is really bad YOU DO NOT WANT BACK PRESSURE) Although it makes up for it in pressure. That is what matty is refering to i believe.
If you want accuracy learn how to use compression maps. Bolting any turbo to any engine is not exactly the most efficient way to go.
1995 Eclipse GST - ~~~~
...in project mode
1999 Eclipse GST winter beater ----
Evo 3 16g
3" turbo back Thermal R&D exhaust
ECMLink
hard upper intercooler pipe
Tein/AGX suspension
Other crap
217k miles
Chris, he was completely completely kidding when he said he didnt know the difference...
but anyhow, with an NA car you need a certain degree of backpressure. that is truth.
Originally posted by gtmustang00
A 350fwhp civic will screw for sure and costs way less. I hate to say it on a forum like this cuz ill get #!#!#!#!, but my next build will be a extremely clean 2 door civic.
Comment